Over the course of this year, HomeStreet Bank moved away from the mortgage business, selling off much of its retail mortgage origination business, along with nearly all of the mortgage servicing rights associated with the loans originated in those retail outlets.
At the time, the bank said that it still planned to originate mortgages, albeit a smaller operation with loans sourced through its bank branches, online banking services, and other relationships.
But, some of those relationships have gotten the bank in trouble with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
The FDIC announced Wednesday that it reached a settlement with HomeStreet Bank after an investigation found that HomeStreet had paid kickbacks to real estate agents and homebuilders in exchange for their mortgage business.
According to the FDIC, HomeStreet will pay a fine of $1.35 million for violations of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act.
As the FDIF states, RESPA “prohibits giving or accepting a thing of value for the referral of settlement service involving a federally related mortgage loan.”
And in the case of HomeStreet, the company was providing payment to real estate brokers and homebuilders for referrals of their mortgage business.
According to the FDIC, the issue stemmed from HomeStreet’s standalone home loan centers, many of which were sold off this year to Homebridge Financial Services.
The FDIC said Wednesday that an investigation found that HomeStreet’s home loan centers entered into certain co-marketing arrangements with real estate brokers in which the bank and brokers marketed their services together using online platforms.
The FDIC’s investigation also determined that the bank entered into desk rental agreements where the bank rented space in the offices of real estate brokers and homebuilders.
According to the FDIC, these arrangements led to the bank paying fees to the real estate brokers and homebuilders for their referrals of mortgage business, a violation of RESPA.
“While co-marketing arrangements and desk rental agreements are permissible where the fees paid bear a reasonable relationship to the fair market value of marketing or rental costs, such arrangements and agreements violate RESPA when the amounts paid exceed fair market value and the excess is for referrals of mortg